Thursday, June 30, 2005

A New Body Bag for the Exquisite Corpse

I was too nice in my recent comment. To be honest, I was holding back because of their link to us, but here's the truth: the Exquisite Corpse is a journal run by a bunch of has-been insider dipshits. The old Exquiste Corpse had at least one cool feature: the "body bag" section where they listed and sometimes snarked their rejected poets. They would also collage lines from rejected poems into exquisite corpses of a sort, which was a pretty original thing to do with rejected work. The poems they actually published have sucked for as long as I've seen the journal. A lot of crap by people trying to sustain their pet movements--neo-beat poetry, neo-Black Mountain School. Partisan hackery. Drivel (now with cutesy introductions beneath the inks). And t' boot--they cut their one cool feature--the "body bag" is no more.

Then there's this: remember how I said that we were listed as the top site in their "hot links" section? And I teased them--and ourselves--a little in the process? I guess they couldn't take it, tame as it was. Now, if you go to their ever-so-cleverly-named "hot links" section, you see this at the top of the list:

"Sincere apologies to those of our unsuspecting readers who followed the recent Poetry Snark link from our website and were treated to a pile of talentless and offensive dribble. We'll screen link requests far more thoroughly from now on!"

Rock! Exquisite Corpse hates us! Does this come straight from the mouth of Andrei Codrescu, or is it from some lesser crony? I wonder what they found offensive. I wish they would have told us so we would know where we're succeeding. Regardless, I'm thrilled to be snarked by the Corpse, pathetic and uncreative as their snark may be. Let me call your attention to something else: Trochee sent out a few requests to random journals to link to our site, and Exquisite Corpse took him up on it apparently without even looking at our blog! You tell me, gentle readers--has the content of this site changed that significantly in the last two weeks, when they first listed us as a "hot site?" Yeah, better "screen more closely," EQ.
No wonder you suck so bad--do you even read your submissions? Apparently, you just publish (or link to) ones with titles that catch your eye.

The same day the Corpse took down the link, the far more traffic'd Contemporary Poetry Review ( listed us as their recommended site of the month. Whatever. We also had the most visitors ever by far that same day. I wonder how long we'll last on the Contemporary Poetry Review. And also, did they check out the blog before linking to us? Do you really love us CPR? Well, whether tis true love or not, just to satisfy my curiousity, will you post a comment to this thread and just say that yes, you checked out this site before posting the link?


Anonymous Anonymous said...

So they don't read their "recommended links"? I guess that's why they were linking to and recommending Xaviera Hollander.

Love is for sale at the EQ!

5:25 AM, July 01, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You best better watch yer ass

There's a rumor going around that Andrei Codrescu has an immense stockpile of machine guns and LSD and that he's entrusted them to none other than Irina Renata Dumitrascu and her legion of bitter expats.

7:24 AM, July 01, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

EC blows. They have blown for a while. Mike Topp is the Carrot Top of the poetry world. Too bad it's not a printmag anymore, at least then you use the paper to start a fire.

7:43 AM, July 01, 2005  
Blogger Alan Cordle said...

That's the sign you've made it! It's like how Poetry Daily can manage to find every article about poetry for their "news" section unless it's a front-pager about Foetry. The one exception: when the NYT ran an article declaring Foetry's "surrender." PD liked that one.

9:30 AM, July 01, 2005  
Blogger R.C. Bald said...

Dear friends, I was under the impression that you "made it" when I linked you. Oh, hearty laughter, for the golden age is nigh, dear friends, & the laurel rests firmly 'pon your temples.

10:59 AM, July 01, 2005  
Blogger Snark said...

Still no answer from The Contemporary Poetry Review...

Do any of these places read their submissions?

4:44 PM, July 05, 2005  
Blogger Agent Trochee said...

The editor at CPRW is pretty busy and does not usually respond in a timely manner if at all to certain things. I doubt he will respond to this though I am sure he looked the site over.

6:20 AM, July 06, 2005  
Anonymous renata said...

anonymous, what is your name and social security number? i belong to multiple bitter secret organizations, many of which I started. we collect information on the world of poetry which we intend to print in an encrypted book using the blood of traitors as ink. watch your stanzas...

1:25 PM, July 18, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

does this really work, or is my computer fucked?
Mark Strand

1:40 AM, August 18, 2005  
Blogger Lester said...

i hoep yu don hav probz wit d way i spel liek totally dependent on spelchek. dood this blog is liek wayyy kewel! yer hott 2 da tuch. i'm 4 real--:i ain't fucken wt ya man. yu r a guy rite? yr blog is liek wachin slomotion sewiside. i dont know hoo yu r but i hoep yu get pubwished some tiem soon becuz yu r awesum and i bet yr pomes r 2! peece out!

7:26 PM, February 16, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home