Last night, Alan of Foetry more or less "interviewed" me for a podcast. Ginger Pennebaker sat in for some of it. It should be up at the Foetry website in a week or two. I'll link to it from here.
How could outing him ruin him? Ismael Ricardo Whateverthefuck Archbold hasn't accomplished anything to be ruined or tainted by the outing. Unless blowing his Snark cover is personally ruinous to him.... that could be true, this is one of the few outlets he has available for his, ahem, creative writing.
Isn't it telling how just about all of the anonymous Foetry and Snark people are either not poets at all, or just very fucking bad poets? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..... !!!!!
Oh, *waaa* the snarks don't like being snarked? Zip your fly, dipshit. You guys haven't done anything good in like a year. Let's see you bring it! "It continues to amaze...sniffle sniffle...waaaaa!"
Oh I wasn't talking to you Jimmy--that was meant for the dude who "outed" Trochee.
BTW, if either one of us gave a shit, we would have simply deleted your comment.
You're right about one thing though: I've been a lazy bum, but it's only been a few months, really. This site hasn't even been around a year. I guess it must feel like a year though to such an ardent fan as yourself.
Well, it's been a year since anything here's been funny. If that pre-dates your existence, well, seems like you have some work to do. Sounds like your boy Trochee drinks a little too much and blabs shit around. Wonder what else came out in the middle of the night...
Or the irony of someone posting as "anonymous" and complaining about the use of pseudonyms... Such a brave man this "anonymous" is.
At least this loser has done you one favor, snarky. Now people know that you are in fact not the same person as Trochee, Ginger, and Blood. Unless you yourself made all of this up...
I had never thought to ask but have we met and I simply don't recall? [shrug] It's true, I have been known to drink alot but that is not how the whole Trochee thing got out. But I am not the sort to point fingers and this is not really a matter of any importance, so why fuss, right? But yes, the persona known as Agent Trochee is me. So what? What amuses me is how folks take things so personally all the time, as if it all really matters. The reason, as I recall it being discussed, for anonymity was for those reasons. It is near impossible to make fun, absurd or, at times, mean-spirited remarks for the sake of humour (&, to not cut corners, provocation) without folks getting totally bent out of shape and confusing the show for the person. Oh but there is little satisfaction from a theatre of the internet and I will be the first to admit that I came to be bored with the whole thing (& busy besides) and spent more time working on other projects. So, no one has taken anything from me or done me any real harm - as ever, as anyone who knows me well enough, I am indifferent.
It is a fool that takes another fool seriously. So, I thank you & the rest for this bubbly affair, for making fools of us all and so this Akla-Seltzer of a moment, a taste of medicine if you will, is just what I need rid me of such gas.
i say mean things all the time too. i need a new author photo like we need a civil war. no, not all anonymous losers spell humor with a "u", just the ones with a little bit of English training. "Careering"? Look it up. And I never was supposed to be funny though some folks seem to think I was but I could never quite see why. Anything else your sourness want to know?
You look like a bedwetting freak. I like how you're not responsible for the dopey things you wrote because it was a persona. Yeah, I stand behind all the shit my persona sprays, dilweed. I can only hope all the snarks are as cool as you. Your "careering" is about to take a nosedive, dupe.
xxxjimmy
PS: "Wasn't funny" isn't the same as "Wasn't supposed to be funny". Poetry is dying for a funny site that gives shit and takes credit for it. Too bad you guys don't got the spines to stand behind your work and stand up for yourselves. Pathetic.
I want to know why he is still reading this daily and, as his multiple posts now indicate, repeatedly each day.
I guess it must be because y'all's writing is so bad and not funny, right. I know that's why I frequent a blog, because I think it sucks and is boring.
Little trochee is quoting Elizabeth Bishop in little e-mails to me. Is he mentally handicapped or something. I don't give a shit about getting e-mails from him. He is a urine-soaked bed-wetting coward who can't write poems.
CHRIST! I had to block careering@gmail.com as a sender so I wouldn't have to get bullshit Emily Dickinson quotes e-mailed to me by your pathetic little trochee. Do you guys *all* ride the short bus?
My question for Ismael is, if Trochee is just a "persona," why does your Live Journal (under your real name) contain many of the same sentiments and employ the same style, more or less, as your Trochee posts? The same goes for your often caustic and snarky comments in the Choriamb community. Don't blow off your actions on this blog as merely the ravings of a "persona," that's fucking weak.
my posts on my LJ often do not discuss poetry and when they do, they are copied out remarks from an article or essay or links to a poet/poem.
as for my "often caustic & snarky comments" at Choriamb, I would hardly consider my comments caustic or snarky though i am forceful, direct and, at times, argumentative, but with a number of folks agreeing with me, well, it seems little cause for alarm. if it were, i imagine i would have been banned.
as i have said previously, i take responsibility for most perceived & actual ill i may have caused. to provide an analogy - if this had been a variety or skit show like SNL, it would all be written off as comedy, good or bad, whatever but since there is conception of a theatre for the internet, given the high degree of no-imagination & hyper-sensitivity amongst a cross-section of readers (here & elsewhere), it falls on me to bear the fullness of said persona. so be it. and what now, Anonymous, would you have of me?
yes, the style of some of my LJ entries and the Trochee posts are similar. chalk that up to a lack of effort, illness, intoxication or whatever suits you; doesn't matter. if one is incapable of seeing the thickness of irony of my Trochee remarks and my actual person, it is because you haven't (a) the foggiest notion of who i am &/or (b) you are dense thicket of trained subjectivity.
32 Comments:
My breath's bated.
Please, please, please.
Trochee's identity is known. The little man would be better off hanging up the mask for now, unless he wants to be exposed.
No, Alan! Actually, it's my wife who's in all of the online magazines that her friends edit. I don't want to ruin her reputation!!! You know the deal.
Agent Trochee is Ismael Archbold, a guy who writes bad poems that no one, not even online magazines, will publish.
Ismael who? That means nothing to me. Outing people on their blogs isn't cool.
And Poetry Snark is really John Lennon, a well known musician.
How could outing him ruin him? Ismael Ricardo Whateverthefuck Archbold hasn't accomplished anything to be ruined or tainted by the outing. Unless blowing his Snark cover is personally ruinous to him.... that could be true, this is one of the few outlets he has available for his, ahem, creative writing.
Isn't it telling how just about all of the anonymous Foetry and Snark people are either not poets at all, or just very fucking bad poets? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..... !!!!!
Go figure.
Hey recent anon -- so which one are you -- the foetry anon or the snark anon?
Snark, Ginger, I have a feeling this podcast will be the wedgie these foets and snarkables really deserve.
Mwahahaha.
If that dude's Trochee he's on thin ice making fun of anybody's looks. I'm just saying.
xxxjimmy
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
It continues to amaze me how these people who profess to despise this site keep returning again and again. And you think we're lame? Do tell.
Oh, *waaa* the snarks don't like being snarked? Zip your fly, dipshit. You guys haven't done anything good in like a year. Let's see you bring it! "It continues to amaze...sniffle sniffle...waaaaa!"
THERE'S NO CRYING IN SNARKING, ASSMUNCHER!!
xxxjimmy
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Oh I wasn't talking to you Jimmy--that was meant for the dude who "outed" Trochee.
BTW, if either one of us gave a shit, we would have simply deleted your comment.
You're right about one thing though: I've been a lazy bum, but it's only been a few months, really. This site hasn't even been around a year. I guess it must feel like a year though to such an ardent fan as yourself.
Snark on,
xxxoooPS
Well, it's been a year since anything here's been funny. If that pre-dates your existence, well, seems like you have some work to do. Sounds like your boy Trochee drinks a little too much and blabs shit around. Wonder what else came out in the middle of the night...
Quit fucking talking about it and do it.
xxxjimmy
Or the irony of someone posting as "anonymous" and complaining about the use of pseudonyms... Such a brave man this "anonymous" is.
At least this loser has done you one favor, snarky. Now people know that you are in fact not the same person as Trochee, Ginger, and Blood. Unless you yourself made all of this up...
Jim & Co.:
I had never thought to ask but have we met and I simply don't recall? [shrug] It's true, I have been known to drink alot but that is not how the whole Trochee thing got out. But I am not the sort to point fingers and this is not really a matter of any importance, so why fuss, right? But yes, the persona known as Agent Trochee is me. So what? What amuses me is how folks take things so personally all the time, as if it all really matters. The reason, as I recall it being discussed, for anonymity was for those reasons. It is near impossible to make fun, absurd or, at times, mean-spirited remarks for the sake of humour (&, to not cut corners, provocation) without folks getting totally bent out of shape and confusing the show for the person. Oh but there is little satisfaction from a theatre of the internet and I will be the first to admit that I came to be bored with the whole thing (& busy besides) and spent more time working on other projects. So, no one has taken anything from me or done me any real harm - as ever, as anyone who knows me well enough, I am indifferent.
It is a fool that takes another fool seriously. So, I thank you & the rest for this bubbly affair, for making fools of us all and so this Akla-Seltzer of a moment, a taste of medicine if you will, is just what I need rid me of such gas.
i say mean things all the time too. i need a new author photo like we need a civil war. no, not all anonymous losers spell humor with a "u", just the ones with a little bit of English training. "Careering"? Look it up. And I never was supposed to be funny though some folks seem to think I was but I could never quite see why. Anything else your sourness want to know?
You look like a bedwetting freak. I like how you're not responsible for the dopey things you wrote because it was a persona. Yeah, I stand behind all the shit my persona sprays, dilweed. I can only hope all the snarks are as cool as you. Your "careering" is about to take a nosedive, dupe.
xxxjimmy
PS: "Wasn't funny" isn't the same as "Wasn't supposed to be funny". Poetry is dying for a funny site that gives shit and takes credit for it. Too bad you guys don't got the spines to stand behind your work and stand up for yourselves. Pathetic.
I want to know why he is still reading this daily and, as his multiple posts now indicate, repeatedly each day.
I guess it must be because y'all's writing is so bad and not funny, right. I know that's why I frequent a blog, because I think it sucks and is boring.
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Snark!
I read lots of shit I think isn't funny--so I can make fun of it. Quit your sobbing, what a little wuss.
And doesn't trochee look like a virgin?
xxxjimmy
PS: I'm looking forward to smoking the snark, too. What a little crybaby.
sure, i take responsibility for what i typed. so what? doesn't change anything right?
[sigh]
Little trochee is quoting Elizabeth Bishop in little e-mails to me. Is he mentally handicapped or something. I don't give a shit about getting e-mails from him. He is a urine-soaked bed-wetting coward who can't write poems.
xxxjimmy
CHRIST! I had to block careering@gmail.com as a sender so I wouldn't have to get bullshit Emily Dickinson quotes e-mailed to me by your pathetic little trochee. Do you guys *all* ride the short bus?
xxxjimmy
I've got a present for you Jimmy...
does greatestlivingpoet@gmail.com ride the short bus? only a retard spazzs over nothing.
Go wet your bed, anonymous! Cowards cannot hurt me.
xxxjimmy
My question for Ismael is, if Trochee is just a "persona," why does your Live Journal (under your real name) contain many of the same sentiments and employ the same style, more or less, as your Trochee posts? The same goes for your often caustic and snarky comments in the Choriamb community. Don't blow off your actions on this blog as merely the ravings of a "persona," that's fucking weak.
Hey anonymous, the real question is: if you think he sucks so bad, why do you read his blog?
These people are real pieces of work.
dear Anonymous,
my posts on my LJ often do not discuss poetry and when they do, they are copied out remarks from an article or essay or links to a poet/poem.
as for my "often caustic & snarky comments" at Choriamb, I would hardly consider my comments caustic or snarky though i am forceful, direct and, at times, argumentative, but with a number of folks agreeing with me, well, it seems little cause for alarm. if it were, i imagine i would have been banned.
as i have said previously, i take responsibility for most perceived & actual ill i may have caused. to provide an analogy - if this had been a variety or skit show like SNL, it would all be written off as comedy, good or bad, whatever but since there is conception of a theatre for the internet, given the high degree of no-imagination & hyper-sensitivity amongst a cross-section of readers (here & elsewhere), it falls on me to bear the fullness of said persona. so be it. and what now, Anonymous, would you have of me?
yes, the style of some of my LJ entries and the Trochee posts are similar. chalk that up to a lack of effort, illness, intoxication or whatever suits you; doesn't matter. if one is incapable of seeing the thickness of irony of my Trochee remarks and my actual person, it is because you haven't (a) the foggiest notion of who i am &/or (b) you are dense thicket of trained subjectivity.
Very entertaining. Glad you're back.
I haven't laughed so hard in ages - you guys put South Park to shame!
Post a Comment
<< Home